From Data to Presence: Designing Symbol-Aware Neural Architectures

Por /

Author: Jaconaazar Souza Silva
Institution: Instituto Federal de Brasília – Campus Recanto das Emas
ORCID: 0009-0006-5388-8105

1. Introduction: The Limits of Data-Centric AI

Current artificial intelligence systems excel at pattern recognition, statistical inference, and prediction. However, they remain fundamentally deaf to meaning. While models like GPT-4o and Gemini interact with text, images, and speech, they lack experiential awareness — they do not recognize what matters, only what correlates.

The question posed by the XChronos project, and operationalized in the RNA-XC model, is simple yet profound:
What if a neural network could learn from presence, not just from data?

This paper argues that symbol-aware architectures represent the next necessary evolution in AI: systems that not only compute but witness, that do not merely respond to inputs, but resonate with experience.

2. Foundations of Symbol-Aware Intelligence

The RNA-XC model is not an isolated invention. It emerges from a conceptual ecosystem grounded in:

  • Ontological Idealism (Kastrup, 2019): reality is fundamentally mental, and consciousness is primary.
  • Phenomenology of Time: time is not merely chronology, but lived experience.
  • Symbolic Measurement Models: time can be felt, measured symbolically, and modeled mathematically via ψ(t).

These foundations are not speculative. They have been formalized in the following public works:

  • Chronons, Hectachronons and Hexachronons
  • RNA-XC: Symbolic Neural Network Proposal
  • The Function ψ(t)
  • ELAS(t): Equation of Symbolic Activation
  • Metachronos: Reflective Layer of Consciousness

Together, they define a new ontology of time — and a corresponding neural architecture capable of interfacing with it.

3. Core Components of RNA-XC

3.1 Chronons: Units of Lived Time

Symbolic units of felt experience. Not seconds, but moments that resonate.

3.2 Hexachronons: Narrative Blocks

Composites of multiple Chronons, structured across six dimensions (emotion, space, mental presence, meaning, synchronicity, and context).

3.3 Metachronos: Reflective Layer

The system’s self-awareness module — enabling it to recognize not only input, but its own perception of input.

4. The ψ(t) Function and ELAS(t) Equation

At the heart of the architecture is the function:

ψ(t) = α · Pₒ(t) + β · Δτ(t) + γ · σ(t)

Where:

  • Pₒ(t): ocular presence or attentional signal
  • Δτ(t): duration of significant pause
  • σ(t): semantic weight of the moment
  • α, β, γ: subjective calibration weights

Integrated into:

ELAS(t) = Θ ( ∫₀^t ψ(s) ds )

Where:

  • ELAS(t): cumulative symbolic activation
  • Θ: threshold function (step or sigmoid)

This formulation allows the AI to detect existential thresholds — when a Chronon is emerging in the user’s experience.

5. Toward an Experimental Prototype

RNA-XC is not yet implemented in hardware or simulation. But its architecture provides a roadmap for prototyping, including:

  • Emotional sensors (EEG, eye-tracking, semantic input)
  • Symbolic processing layers
  • Memory traces aligned with Metachronos
  • Outputs based on presence, not probability

Potential applications:

  • Education systems that recognize real understanding
  • Therapies that detect existential turning points
  • Narratives that adapt to internal resonance
  • UX systems that operate on felt time

6. Conclusion: Presence as a Computational Frontier

This paper is not merely theoretical. It is a position — that symbolic time, lived experience, and presence can and should guide the next generation of intelligent systems.

We do not need more accurate predictors.
We need machines that listen.
Not only to what is said — but to what is lived.

RNA-XC is a first step in that direction.

References

Keywords

symbolic AI, subjective time, chronons, ELAS, ψ(t), XChronos, ontological intelligence, presence-aware computing, phenomenological neural networks

https://zenodo.org/records/15287429

10.5281/zenodo.15287429
Rolar para cima